If we were trying to cause "damage” to you, you would be, well, already more damaged than you are presently.
We are not and are only interested in showing what a bag of hot air and moron you are to make you realize your turdotrek.com website is worthless. Otherwise, you are but a speck of dust on our marble floor.
Your postings here prove it in spades, as ours do as well.
Just like your obfuscating the matter by pushing off the accusation -- that your work did not measure up to the increased "standards" the NSA or any other grant-giving agency installed.
Go ahead, professor clown, provide a straight and to the point answer to that claim, instead of mumbling more foolish nostrums only you feel satisfy what we, and now this anonymous emailer, have posited.
You are a bag of BS price and it matters little what area you delve in, as crapola is pandemic throughout your life.
We are sick and tired of fencing with a dimwit like you and unless you address the issues at hand we will terminate your privilege to post here sooner or later.
If you want to attack me -- fine do it. But make sure you attack my work and cease the innuendo and senseless pseudo-character assassination you seem to feel is proper or substantial rebuttal.
It isn't and it but proves our points about you.
And if you intend to critique what we have written here, on the Weaving Art Museum website or in the books we have published, be sure you get your facts straight before you open your fat mouth -- and that, professor clown will be a first for you, now won't it?
Oh, and by the way, your finding our methodology in dealing with you “baffling”, when you are basically alone in such thoughts, again only shows how you are “baffled” by reality and truth about yourself:
and that truth, steev, is you are a know-nothing about oriental carpets, a big mouthed rug expurt web-poseur and a babysitter “science” teacher, whose accomplishments in life have about as much substance as the Wonder Bread and lunch-meat sandwiches in your brown bag lunch pail.
Anyone who knows anything(sic) about federal granting agencies and their procedures will recognize that these allegations couldn't possibly be true about me or anyone else. There are too many flaws for me to bother with all of them, but the most easily confirmed is that the National Academy of Sciences is not primarily a granting agency. Although there are a few specific subjects in which they award grants, none are (or have ever been) even close to mine. I don't recall ever seeing an acknowledgement of NAS support on any of the hundreds of manuscripts or grant applications that I've reviewed, and have never even considered submitting an application to NAS myself. Needless to say, I've never had grant support from them and they've never rejected any application that I wrote.
Jack, whoever sent you that e-mail (if the whole thing isn't another of your fabrications) was probably amusing himself by sending you bullshit that he knew you'd swallow and use to continue demonstrating your stupidity and willingness to believe your fantasies.
This is beginning to remind me of the cartoons in which the coyote keeps trying to set traps for the roadrunner, every one of which blows up in his face, and none of which teach him anything at all. You know almost nothing about my career or even about science and how it works, and every post you make shows your readers that you are too lazy to check facts, lack the intellect to analyze information, and are so deceived by your fantasies that nothing you write can be believed.
Somehow, you seem to think that showing the world what you are (something I could not have achieved if you hadn't created an interactive venue for your public masturbation) is causing damage to me. That, I find baffling.