Home > War, Politics and the Election 2008 >Two Very Distressing News Flashes
Author:M. Parent posted by jc
Mon, Oct 8th, 2007 01:08:15 PM
Topic: Two Very Distressing News Flashes

(ed. This, and the following new flash just below the dotted line, portend something big is in the works.

Let's remember just before 9/11 there was unusual options activity, which by the eay has never become public eventhough the SEC knows who placed them.

There were also some signs top government officials knew not to fly in commercial planes in early september, as well.

And, let's not forget the FEMA "drill" in NYC on 9/11 along with Cheney's role in scheduling and officiating airforce "drills" concerning the possible hijacking of planes, etc on 9/11.

Read these two news articles and make up your own mind.)



Why would the Fed Board of Governors decide to meet in such a place unless they KNOW something terribly huge is going to happen to the United States next month? This information on top of the stories below are unmistakable signals to us that something terrible is going to happen and the big shots already know it. . . . . .

Please spread the information on this web page along to every American so as many as possible know in advance that any "disaster" or "terrorist attack" or "economic collapse" was no suprise to our government. They clearly know something is going to happen and they are apparently going to let it happen.

We may be forced to grab-up members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors BEFORE they get into the COG so they can be properly "dealt with" when whatever happens, happens. The only reason they would head into the COG is to hide from angry Americans.

My advice to the government and to the Bankers is simple: Come clean now. Tell us the truth, the whole truth and nothng but the truth right now, BEFORE disaster strikes so we can make rational decisions, make rational plans and get through it as smoothly as possible - even if there's no way to avoid it. HOWEVER, if you conceal what seems to be coming and you allow it to blind-side us, there won't be any place for any of you to hide. We will hunt you down and deal with you for concealing the truth and thus harming us worse.

More info as it becomes available. . . .


$4.5b bet on another 9/11 within 4 weeks
Mystery trader bets market will crash by a third

$4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe within four weeks

Anybody have a clue as to what these 'investors' are expecting?

The two sales are being referred to by market traders as "bin Laden trades" because only an event on the scale of 9-11 could make these short-sell options valuable.

There are 65,000 contracts @ $750.00 for the SPX 700 calls for open interest. That controls 6.5 million shares at $750 = $4.5 Billion. Not a single trade. But quite a bit of $$ on a contract that is 700 points away from current value. No one would buy that deep "in the money" calls. No reason to. So if they were sold looks like someone betting on massive dislocation. Lots of very strange option activity that I haven't seen before.

The entity or individual offering these sales can only make money if the market drops 30%-50% within the next four weeks. If the market does not drop, the entity or individual involved stands to lose over $1 billion just for engaging in these contracts!

Clearly, someone knows something big is going to happen BEFORE the options expire on Sept. 21.

The following theories are being discussed widely within the stock and options markets today regarding the enormous and very unusual activity reported above and two stories below. Those theories are:
1) A massive terrorist attack is going to take place before Sept. 21 to tank the markets, OR;

2) China, reeling over losing $10 Billion in bad loans to the sub-prime mortgage collapse presently taking place, is going to dump US currency and tank all of Capitalism with a Communist financial revolution. Either scenario is bad and the clock is ticking. The drop-dead date of these contracts is September 21. Whatever is going to happen MUST take place between now and then or the folks involved in these contracts will lose over $1 billion for having engaged in this activity.

"$1.78 Billion Bet that Stock Markets will crash by third week in September Anonymous Stock Trader Sells 10K Contracts on EVERY S&P/Y "Strike" Shorts Stocks "in the money" effectively selling all his SPY holdings for cash up front without pressuring the market downward.

This is an enormous and dangerous stock option activity. If it goes right, the guy makes about $2 Billion. If he's wrong, his out of pocket costs for buying these options will exceed $700 Million!!! The entity who sold these contracts can only make money if the stock market totally crashes by the third week in September.

Bear in mind that the last time anyone conducted such large and unusual stock option trades (like this one) was in the weeks before the attacks of September 11.

Back then, they bought huge numbers of PUTS on airline stocks in the same airlines whose planes were involved in the September 11 attacks.

Despite knowing who made these trades, the Securities and Exchange Commission NEVER revealed who made the unusual trades and no one was ever publicly identified as being responsible for the trades which made upwards of $50 million when the attacks happened.

The fact that this latest activity by a single entity gambles on a complete collapse of the entire market by the third week in September, seems to indicate someone knows something really huge is in the works and they intend to profit almost $2 Billion within the next four weeks from whatever happens! This is really worrisome."

Author: paul smith
Mon, Oct 8th, 2007 01:08:15 PM

RK Replies: NPR, like many other supposed "alternate news sources", is nothing but, in reality, a front.

Granted their reportage is a bit more damning than other outlets but, and THIS is the point here Paul(if that's really your name), they only scratch the surface of the chicanery, thievery and worse our government is transacting.

Also, FYI, NPR is bankrolled by one of the most conservative companies(Archer Daniels Midland). Go study where they get their financial support and you will learn we are correct.

There ain't no free press and frankly it is getting worse every day and soon it will be obvious to all, even you Paul.

And by the way, this area of little of RK’s website has been professionally hacked and had articles removed.

We have proof of where and how this attack was done, and it is not something a normal hacker could have accomplished.

But, in the end, this back and forth with you is a only waste of RK's time.

If you really examine the facts, and not the hearsay everything is OK attitude you spout, you will have to face the fact major media outlets are totally controlled and what you read is as censored and controlled as it was in Germany and Russia.

If you can't understand this then please go bark up someone else's tree...we have no interest in speaking to deaf and dumb ears.


Well, actually, citing Seymour Hersh absolutely supports my claim that we have a free press, your fair reference to the small number of multinational corporations that control most news outlets notwithstanding. If we didn't have a free press (as with Nazi Germany, or more ominously with Putin's Russia), this sort of reporting would not be available in a magazine with national distribution. I would also call your attention to National Public Radio, which right-wing political forces have tried to shut down to no avail. You know Bush would love to see NPR disappear, but he can't do it. There is outstanding investigative journalism going on in this country: Atlantic Monthly, Harpers, not to mention the proliferation of small fringe publications and of course the cacaphony of the web. The case of Putin's Russia is useful as an illustration, since the govt controls broadcast media, but the print media often has courageously put out critical stories but few in Russia read them, and even then journalists like Anna Politkovskaya get murdered mysteriously. That isn't happening here. No one is shutting down your website, either, though it seems that there are a bunch of folks who have issues with you. Anyway, my original point is that the story you posted (which of course was not censored by the government) was demonstrated by the simple passage of time to be a false threat. I think you have to accept this as evidence that some of your sources are putting stuff out there that is completely bogus. My second point, somewhat more subtle, is that the repetition of out-there unfounded stories allows people to discount genuine information that is more worthy of our attention and concern. A more conspiracy-minded person with my perspective might be tempted to claim that sinister elements in the government could put these stories out there simply to discredit the stories of issues that we should be focusing on. Were that the case, you could be serving the forces you want to resist.

Author: paul smith
Mon, Oct 8th, 2007 01:27:54 AM

RK Replies:


Your viewpoint is completely wrong.

Your citing Seymour Hersh, who is by the way just about the ONLY major media journalist to write factual and damaging stories about our government, as a defense against what we said is pure hyperbole. One journalist, like Hersh, does not make a "free press" - far from it.

FACT: There are so many issues that are not only under reported, but not reported at all, to make moot your position.

And do you know that basically all the media outlets(TV, raido and print) are now controlled by only a handful of corporations and they censor the news as effectively as was done in Germany and Russia?

So please, if you wish to discuss this topic with us, get your facts straight -- we surely have ours in order and can demonstrate their validity with fact and not "best wishes" or unfounded belief.


To equate the commercialized American media with the censorship of Nazi Germany is hyperbole. While some outlets of the media marketplace silence some complex ideas, excellent journalism that challenges our government's policies is not hard to find. You mention Bush and Cheney's intentions of starting war with Iran and the continuing blunder of the Iraq war. The New Yorker Magazine continues to publish Seymour Hersh's brilliant reporting on these issues. Check out the current issue with the wonderful cover of Ahmedinejad ("narrow stance"--it's pretty funny) to find the second article Hersh has written reporting on the current administration's efforts to lead us into conflict with Iran.

Author: paul smith
email: psmith@wsu.edu
Sat, Oct 6th, 2007 02:36:48 PM

RK Replies:

Greetings Paul: and thanks for spending some of your time reading what is posted in this Topic Area.

Perhaps you might realize when certain plans are exposed, even in the limited way most of these articles are posed, it might, just might, prevent some of them from happening.

RK doesn't want to begin to open the can of worms the "conspiracy" word seems to engender but, quite frankly, we see little "conspiracy" among these folks who it is pointed at and lots of "conspiracy" among those who are in power in government and the private sector.

So, therefore, we must say we disagree with you and those who hang the "conspiracy" label on anyone who differs from mainstream ideas.

And, by the way, we do not believe your comment
"Viewed historically, many news sources in the US are doing a pretty good job, if you are willing to go out and read them."
is factual.

We disagree with this viewpoint because under the pretense of a “free press” the major media outlets (TV, radio and newspapers) in America are about as controlled as Russia’s Pravda was and as was Hitler's press.

We are also not interested in taking more time to prove what we say, as it appears you believe different.

But, just for grins, how about the way the media outlets are handling(or should we say not handling) Iraq, the run up to war with Iran, bush's romp at destroying Constitutional government(same could be said for bill clinton and reagan's time), the militarization of state and local police forces, the loss of separation of powers in federal government, and on and on.

Where is this "news" disseminated? Well, the only honest answer is, it isn't and that's just the tip of the iceberg.

Once again, thanks for posting your comments and although we realize few people read these articles we cull from independent sources, even if one person does, it serves our purposes.


OK, I won't get into some of the weaving debates here, lest I get skewered (uh-oh, I LIKE baluchi weaving and don't think you have spend $10K+ to find soulful and beautiful weaving art, and I imagine the thousands of women who wove these things up there in Paradise looking down on us--mainly white guys--pathetically trying to dissect their noble efforts), but a lot of these news posts are annoying in their black-helicopter conspiracy-theory fear mongering.

This one, seeming to predict an imminent 9/11-style attack in which the govt is somehow complicit or aware, has been shown, with the simple passage of time (now early Oct) to be utterly bogus.

There are legitimate fears of at-worst evil and at-best incompetence from Bush and Cheney (hmm, worst and best being relative with these two) and others that we love to despise, without promoting these easily-dismissable paranoid claims of disaster.

Let's focus on the verifiable and avoid the goofy.

Viewed historically, many news sources in the US are doing a pretty good job, if you are willing to go out and read them.

Home   Buy/Sell at the Kazbah   Terms Of Service