Home > Archive >stev price=clown
Author:jc
email:
Tue, Dec 7th, 2004 07:44:44 PM
Topic: stev price=clown

Clown:

You continue but still fanatasize mere nonesense.

It is twice in two weeks, steev - only a pedantic professor=clown like yourself would cling to "being right" when you are wrong.

Author: jc
email:
Tue, Dec 7th, 2004 07:44:44 PM

Clown:

Since you can't understand the difference between fact and fiction here's the facts:

On Friday, Dec 3rd 01:09:49 PM Author: Steve Price wrote: "Hi JC For someone who never looks at ****, you manage to quote us often enough. This is the second or third time this week. Which of your long time readers sent you that e-mail? Was it India's president, Dr. Avul Pakir Jainulabdeen Abdul Kalam? If so, I'm honored."

Even a lame bogus pedagogue like you, professor clown, can realize anything made after that wouldn't be considered part of your complaint. So why cite them, you dope.

Oh, that’s right, this is the “scientific method” pseudo-scientists like you use to “prove” your theories. How foolish of us here at RK.com to forget that.

OK, flap-jaw, enough dream-boating – now hear this:
Since only two of the instances you so sophomorically mention occurred prior to the date of your initial post that started this futile exercise anyone with enough cranial capacity to open a package of cereal (and that we guess includes you steev) would conclude there were only two mentions, not the three or, as you now see fit to argue, four citations.

Calling you an idiot, steev, gives you too much benefit so why don't we put this to bed now that everyone of our readers has seen you prove once again your even less than idiot status.

As we told you before, steev, better get in the corner with your dunce cap on before you wet yourself. But this time face the wall and no talking to your fellow carpet-clod, jr. howe.

Author: Steve Price
email: sprice@hsc.vcu.edu
Tue, Dec 7th, 2004 10:42:42 AM

Hi JC

Are you hard of reading or hard of counting?

Let me help you out. Here are the three posts in which you quoted material from Turk0tek during those two weeks, plus another made a day or so later. The dates are taken from RugCashBar.com, so if any of the dates are incorrect the errors are yours:

Dec 6, in "Truth Hurts Department" (Fools think, others know)

Dec 4, in "Truth Hurts Department" (Fools think, others know)

Nov 24, in "Pictures for Discussion" (Chicken or Egg)

Nov 21, in "Pictures for Discussion" (The Craddock Ersari Torba, Part I)

What was it you were saying about people who insist that they're right even when it's obvious that they're wrong?

I love how most of the posts you make quoting Turk0tek include a statement about how that post doesn't change the fact that you don't quote Turk0tek. It must be wonderful to be so undisturbed by facts.

You're an idiot.

Home   Buy/Sell at the Kazbah   Terms Of Service